International Open Access Journal Platform

logo
open
cover
Current Views: 958682
Current Downloads: 1269400

Psychology of China

ISSN Print: 2664-1798
ISSN Online: 2664-1801
Contact Editorial Office
Join Us
DATABASE
SUBSCRIBE
Journal index
Journal
Your email address

感知情绪失效量表在中国青少年中的信效度检验

Testing Reliability and Validity of the Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale in Chinese Adolescents

Psychology of China / 2020,2(6):489-503  / 2020-06-08 look1841 look3127
  • Authors: 赵海燕¹      郑春婵¹      周建华²*     
  • Information:
    1. 北海卫生学校临床医学教研室,北海;
    2. 华南师范大学心理院,广州
  • Keywords: 感知情绪失效量表(PIES);中国青少年;信效度;测量等值
  • Perceived invalidation of emotion scale (PIES); Chinese adolescents;Reliability; Validity; Measurement invariance
  • Abstract: 目的:修订感知情绪失效量表(The Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale,PIES)中文版,并在国内青少年群体中检验其信度、效度和跨性别的测 量等值性。方法:选取994名青少年进行测量,回收有效问卷964份,并在4周后, 随机选取133名被试进行重测,用以检验PIES中文版的结构效度、校标关联效度、 内部一致信度与重测信度,并检验 PIES 中文版的跨性别的测量等值。结果:验 证性因素分析显示,PIES 中文版的单因素模型各项拟合指数均拟合良好;PIES 中文版与幸福感、积极情感显著负相关,与关系需要受挫、孤独、抑郁呈显著 正相关。PIES 中文版内部一致性信度良好,重测信度为 0.74。多组验证性因素 分析结果显示,跨性别的形态等值、因子负荷等值与截距等值均被接受。结论: PIES 中文版具有良好的信效度以及跨性别的测量等值性,可以作为测量我国青 少年群体感知情绪失效的可靠工具。
  • Objective: Testing the reliability, validity and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale (PIES) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: 964 middle school students were investigated, 133 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of PIES after 4 weeks for test-retest reliability. WHO well-being index, positive emotions, relationships needs frustration, loneliness and depression were used as the criteria related validity instrument. Results: The internal consistency reliability of PIES was 0.91, and the test-retest reliabilities were 0.74. Perceived invalidation of emotion was negatively correlated with WHO well-being index, positive emotions and positively correlated with relationships needs frustration, loneliness and depression. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the one-factor model of PIES had good fit with the data. The configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance of the Chinese version of PIES across gender were all acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of PIES has good reliability and validity, as well as gender equivalence.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0206034
  • Cite: 赵海燕,郑春婵,周建华.感知情绪失效量表在中国青少年中的信效度检验[J].中国心理学前沿,2020,2(6):489-503.
    https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0206034
Already have an account?
+86 027-59302486