International Open Access Journal Platform

基于社会困境中第三方干预的偏好与其声誉评价：系统综述

Third-party Intervention Preferences and Their Reputation Evaluation in Social Dilemmas: A Systematic Review

Psychology of China / 2025,7(3): 408-419 / 2025-04-11 51 103

View Download PDF

• Authors: 张增彤      黄肖玉      赵亚莉      蔡霞      张振     
• Information:

  河南师范大学，新乡

• Keywords: 社会困境；第三方干预；偏好；声誉
• Social dilemmas; Third-party intervention; Preferences; Reputation
• Abstract: 本研究明确第三方干预中的选择偏好及其声誉评价，并探究第三方干预及其声誉的关键影响因素。使用混合方法评价工具（MMAT），检索国内外已有研究（2000年—2024年），共3965篇文献（英文3079篇，中文886篇），筛选出59篇，再经过文献质量评价，最终获得满足系统分析条件的研究有53篇。系统综述得出：在第三方干预偏好中，补偿占主导，但惩罚的情境性更加明显；儿童和青少年作为第三方时，其偏好具有发展性特征；成人研究中，偏好差异常受情境驱动；第三方干预偏好是一个受个体特质、情境特征、社会文化及生理心理状态共同作用的复杂决策过程，其核心机制体现在共情正义与成本权衡的互动中。而在声誉评价中，干预类型对声誉评价的影响最值得关注，且遵循“温暖优先”原则，其形成机制可概括为：行为动机——感知维度——文化规范的三阶模型。结论：具有普遍存在补偿偏好现象，其具有较高的声誉。
• This study aims to clarify third-party intervention preferences and their corresponding reputation evaluations, while also exploring the key factors influencing both intervention and reputational consequences. Utilizing the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), a comprehensive review of relevant literature published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted. A total of 3,965 studies were retrieved (3,079 in English and 886 in Chinese), of which 59 were initially selected. Following quality assessment, 53 studies met the criteria for systematic analysis. The review revealed that, among third-party intervention preferences, compensation are predominant, whereas punishment exhibit greater situational specificity. When children and adolescents serve as third-party interveners, their preferences demonstrate developmental characteristics. In adult populations, preference differences are largely context-dependent. Thirdparty intervention preference is a complex decision-making process shaped by individual traits, situational factors, sociocultural influences, and physiological-psychological states. Its underlying mechanism lies in the dynamic interaction between empathic concern for justice and cost-benefit trade-offs. Regarding reputational evaluation, the type of intervention plays a pivotal role and generally aligns with the “warmth-over-competence” principle. The mechanism of reputation formation can be conceptualized as a three-stage model: behavior motivation → perceived dimensions → cultural norms. In conclusion, there is a widely observed preference for compensation, which is associated with higher reputational value.
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0703065
• Cite: 张增彤，黄肖玉，赵亚莉，等．基于社会困境中第三方干预的偏好与其声誉评价：系统综述［J］．中国心理学前沿，2025，7（3）：408-419．