International Open Access Journal Platform

冲动性与主动和被动拖延：认知闭合需求的中介作用

Impulsivity and Passive and Active Procrastination: The Mediating Effects of Need for Cognitive Closure

Psychology of China / 2021,3(11)：1320-1329 / 2021-12-09 448 472

View Download PDF

• Authors: 曲晓艳     
• Information:

  武汉大学哲学学院，武汉

• Keywords: 冲动性；认知闭合需要；被动拖延；主动拖延
• Impulsivity; Need for cognitive closure; Passive procrastination; Active procrastination
• Abstract: 目的：探讨中国大学生冲动性、认知闭合需要和主动拖延、被动拖延的关系，并进一步探讨认知闭合需要在冲动性和拖延之间的中介作用。方法：采用冲动性量表（UPPS）、认知闭合需要（NFC）、一般拖延量表（GA）和主动拖延量表（APS）对 233 名中国大学生进行调查。采用相关分析、方差分析和多层回归分析对数据进行分析。结果：非拖延者、被动拖延者和主动拖延者在大学生的冲动性和认知闭合需要上存在着显著差异；认知闭合需要在冲动性和被动拖延之间没有中介作用，但在冲动性和主动拖延之间起到完全中介作用。结论：具有不同拖延表现形式的中国大学生个体在冲动性和认知闭合需要上均有不同表现，冲动性对主动拖延的影响受到认知闭合需要的中介。
• Objective: To investigate the relationships among impulsivity, need for cognitive closure and academic procrastination in Chinese students. Methods: 233 Chinese college students were assessed with the revised Chinese version of the UPPS, NFC, GA and APS for their impulsivity, need for cognitive closure, passive procrastination and active procrastination respectively. Correlation Analysis, variance analysis and multiple hierarchical regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: Significant differences of impulsivity and need for cognitive closure were found among different types of procrastination with the analysis of variance. And need for cognitive closure had a full mediation effect for impulsivity and active procrastination, but not for impulsivity and passive procrastination. Conclusion: Individuals with academic procrastination shows different types, such as passive procrastination and active procrastination, with which Chinese college students are different in the intensity and quality of impulsivity and need for cognitive closure.
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0311151
• Cite: 曲晓艳．冲动性与主动和被动拖延：认知闭合需求的中介作用［J］．中国心理学前沿，2021，3（11）：1320-1329．