This paper revised the Chinese version of the Materialism-PostMaterialism Index (R-MPMI) and examined differences in values across populations. 182 and 434 subjects completed the initial and retest, respectively. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the materialism and post-materialism indexes of the Chinese version of the R-MPMI each had one dimension; the validation factor showed that the one-factor models of the materialism and post-materialism indexes met the psychometric criteria, and the fit indices were above 0.90; the reliability coefficients of the materialism and post-materialism indexes of the Chinese version of the R-MPMI were above 0.80; materialism and post-materialism were significantly negatively correlated, materialism was significantly different by gender, and post-materialism was significantly positively correlated with age, there were differences in post-materialism scores among subjects with different education. The results indicate that the Chinese version of the R-MPMI index has good reliability and validity and can be used as an applied tool to measure materialism and post-materialism values.