International Open Access Journal Platform

控烟干预手段对不同社会支持水平吸烟大学生戒烟效果的影响

Effects of tobacco control interventions on smoking cessation among college students with different social support levels

Psychology of China / 2019,1(7): 512-523 / 2019-09-24 5960 9084

View Download PDF

• Authors: 蔺文韬*      梁晓燕     
• Information:

  山西大学教育科学学院，太原

• Keywords: 大学生吸烟；社会支持；尼古丁依赖程度
• Smoking among college students; Social support; Nicotine dependence
• Abstract: 目的：在健康信念模型视角下探讨控烟干预手段对不同社会支持水平吸烟大学生戒烟效果的影响，为有效干预不同社会支持水平大学生的吸烟情况提供参考。方法：根据尼古丁依赖检验量表（FTND）和社会支持评定量表的得分，选取了90 名有吸烟行为的男性大学生为调查对象，采用2×3 的被试间实验设计，其中自变量为社会支持水平（高社会支持和低社会支持）和不同形式的吸烟干预手段（视频干预组、图片干预组和控制组），因变量为被试尼古丁依赖程度的变化量。结果：图片和视频干预组尼古丁依赖程度的变化量不存在显著差异，但均显著低于控制组（p<0.05）；高社会支持水平组和低社会支持水平组尼古丁依赖程度的变化量存在显著差异（p<0.05）；社会支持与吸烟干预手段在对戒烟效果的影响存在交互作用（p<0.05）。结论：在健康信念模型视角下通过视频， 图片材料对吸烟大学生进行干预能有效改善吸烟大学生的尼古丁依赖程度，图片材料组的效果略好于视频组但不具有统计学意义，干预材料对社会支持水平高的被试的干预效果好于社会支持水平低的被试的干预效果。
• Objective: To control the effects of tobacco interventions on smoking cessation among college students with different social support levels from the perspective of the health belief model, and to provide reference for effective intervention of smoking among college students with different social support levels. Methods: According to the score of the Nicotine Dependence Test Scale (FTND) and the Social Support Rating Scale, 90 male college students with smoking behavior were selected as the respondents. The 2×3 inter-tester experimental design was adopted, in which the independent variable was social support. Levels (high social support and low social support) and different forms of smoking interventions (video intervention group, picture intervention group and control group), the dependent variable is the number of changes in the degree of nicotine dependence of the subject. Results: There were no significant differences in the degree of nicotine dependence between the image and video intervention groups, but they were significantly lower than the control group (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in the amount of nicotine dependence between the superior social support level group and the low social support level group (p<0.05); there was just an interaction between social support and smoking interventions on the effect of smoking cessation (p<0.05). Conclusion: In the perspective of the health belief model, the intervention of smoking students through video and picture materials can effectively improve the nicotine dependence of smoking college students. The effect of the picture material is slightly better than the video group but not statistically significant. Intervention materials have high social support level. The intervention effect of the participants was preferable to that of the subjects with low social support.
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0107032
• Cite: 蔺文韬，梁晓燕．控烟干预手段对不同社会支持水平吸烟大学生戒烟效果的影响［J］．中国心理学前沿，2019，1（7）：512-523．
  https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0107032