国际中文开源期刊平台

文学评论中后现代主义文论的理论误区

The Theoretical Errors of Postmodernism in Literary Criticism

语言学 / 2019,1(1)：44-51 / 2019-11-29 834 991

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 何红     
• 单位：

  湖北第二师范学院，武汉

• 关键词： 后现代文论；语言学；人性；形象性
• The literary theory of post-modernism; Philology; Human nature; Graphic art
• 摘要： 后现代主义文论最大的理论误区在于颠倒了现象同本质的关系，从而抽空和置换了文学最本质的东西，即人性和审美。传统的文学基本命题是“文学即人学”、“艺术即人性”，“艺术即形象思维”。而后现代主义文化的主要命题是:“语言即形象”，“艺术即手法”。形象成为了“各种不同主语的固定谓语的能力”，这样就颠覆了文学的本质。他们从根本上无视文学审美与文学人性等本质性的东西，而专门在现象上大做文章，偷天换日地将文学转换成了冷冰冰的语言学，沉迷于文学语言学的学究式考据，停留于语言学分析的技术操作层，使得文论丧失了对文学指导的前瞻性与批判性。这种“玩文学”的做法竟然把文学理论变成了一场纯粹的语言学游戏，因而值得人们反思。
• The most thing of theory mistake to post-modernism is to reverse the connection of phenomenon and essence, so it makes time and permutes the essence of literature. This essence is human nature and aesthetics. The traditional literature accents that literature is human knowledge, art is human nature, art uses image thought. But post-modernism says that tongue is image, art is technology, and image turns into the ability to roots predicate. So, they overthrow the essence of literature. They disdain the essence of literature for human nature or literature aesthetics, and they wallow philological phenomenon and philological textual research. So, these theories lose literature auspice and instruction. They make literature theory to be a philological game. This is good for us to rhetorical question.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/lin.0101005c
• 引用： 何红．文学评论中后现代主义文论的理论误区［J］．语言学，2019，1（1）：44-51．