国际中文开源期刊平台

论以房抵债协议排除强制执行的情形

Research on the Agreement of Paying Debts by House in Exclusion of the Enforcement

社会科学进展 / 2024,6(3)：700-706 / 2024-06-18 193 438

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 林铸达      刘荣城     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院，上海

• 关键词： 以房抵债；案外人；排除强制执行
• Agreement of paying debts by house; Outsiders; Exclusion of enforcement
• 摘要： 社会实践过程中，常常因各种原因而产生大量债权债务纠纷，作为处理和消灭债权债务的一种新型交易模式，“以房抵债”应运而生。但是在我国现行法律及执行异议相关司法解释中，以房抵债的含义模糊不清，导致法律适用有困难，法律效果尚待明晰。然而，在现实情况下，债务人与债权人达成以房抵债协议后，因各种原因没有及时过户的现象比比皆是。此时，若债务人有其他债务涉诉案件，其名下抵债的房屋被其他债权人、抵押权人申请执行，该房屋受让人是否能提起案外人执行异议之诉，从而对抗被查封的抵债房屋的强制执行？实践中各级法院在不同情形下适用“以房抵债”这一术语时，会出现同案不同判的情况，从而对案外人、抵押权人、被执行人的金钱债权人的利益影响也不相同。故此，本文在“以房抵债”语境下探求当事人的真实意思，将以房抵债进行类型化区分，通过检索不同类型下的五个司法案例，总结分析其排除执行之可能性，进一步探索现有制度下以房抵债受让人排除强制执行的适用规则。
• In the course of social practice, a large number of credit and debt disputes often arise for variousreasons, and as a new mode of transaction to deal with and extinguish credit and debt, the “Agreement ofPaying Debts by House” came into being. However, in China’s current laws and judicial interpretation ofthe implementation of objections, the meaning of the house against the debt is ambiguous, resulting indifficulties in the application of the law, the legal effect is yet to be clarified. However, in reality, the debtorand the creditor to reach an agreement with the house against the debt, for various reasons did not timelytransfer of the phenomenon abound. At this time, if the debtor has other debts involved in litigationcases, its name against the debt of the house by other creditors, mortgagees apply for execution, the housetransferee can file an outsider execution of objections, so as to fight against the seized against the debtof the house of the enforcement of the house? In practice, all levels of courts in different circumstances,the application of the term “against the debt”, there will be the same case different cases, and thus on theoutsider, the mortgagee, the interests of the executor’s money creditors are not the same. Therefore, thisarticle explores the real meaning of the parties in the context of “Agreement of Paying Debts by House”,differentiates the debt against house by typology, summarizes and analyzes the possibility of exclusionof enforcement by searching five judicial cases under different types, and further explores the applicablerules of exclusion of enforcement by the assignee of the debt against house under the existing system.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0603062
• 引用： 林铸达，刘荣城．论以房抵债协议排除强制执行的情形［J］．社会科学进展，2024，6（3）：700-706.