With the advent of the AI era, the use of AIGC for “creation” isbecoming more and more common. Users promote AIGC to generate picturesby entering keywords and selecting painting styles. This kind of picturesgenerated by AIGC is difficult to constitute the status of the work. TheCopyright Law has a specific legislative purpose and clarifies the constituentelements of the work. The main body of the work must be a natural person. Evenif the AIGC user is regarded as the author of the picture, the generated picturecannot constitute the work. Due to the existence of the algorithm black box,users cannot control and improve the picture production process. After a multiangleanalysis of the work, it is not difficult to find that the pictures generatedby AIGC may meet the requirements of originality, but the production processdoes not meet the definition of creation and should not be called intellectualachievement, let alone obtain the status of the work.