国际中文开源期刊平台

我国文书提出命令制度中除外事由的构建研究——以大陆法系民事诉讼为主要参考

A Study on the Construction of Excepted Causes in the Order System of Documents in China — Taking Civil Litigation in the Civil Law System as the Main Reference

社会科学进展 / 2024,6(2)：278-289 / 2024-05-08 164 177

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 姚佳怡     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院法律学院，上海

• 关键词： 文书提出命令；除外事由；民事诉讼
• Filing order; Excepted causes; Civil action
• 摘要： 矫正证据偏在现象、探知案件真实是我国文书提出命令制度的设立初衷。2019年最高人民法院颁布《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》标志着文书提出命令制度的适用规则得到进一步细化，但新规中仍未提及文书提出义务除外事由或可以拒绝提出的法定情形。除外事由缺乏势必会对文书持有人造成不合理的诉讼负担，忽视了持有人对文书所享有的特定利益。因此有必要厘清我国文书提出命令及其除外事由的立法发展源流，抽象概括除外事由缺乏所导致的实践困境，继而以大陆法系民事诉讼法的成功经验为镜鉴，为构建我国除外事由提供路径建议。
• The original intention of the order system is to correct the deviationof evidence and discover the truth of the case. In 2019, the Supreme People’sCourt promulgated the “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings”,which marked the further elaboration of the applicable rules of the documentfiling order system, but the new regulations still did not mention the reasons forexcluding the obligation of filing documents or the legal circumstances underwhich filing can be refused. A lack of exclusions would inevitably impose anunreasonable litigation burden on the holder of the instrument, ignoring theparticular interests of the holder in the instrument. Therefore, it is necessary toclarify the legislative development source of the order and its exclusions in ourcountry, abstractically summarize the practical dilemma caused by the lack ofexclusions, and then take the successful experience of civil procedure law in thecivil law system as a reference to provide suggestions for the construction ofChina’s exclusions.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0602023
• 引用： 姚佳怡．我国文书提出命令制度中除外事由的构建研究——以大陆法系民事诉讼为主要参考［J］．社会科学进展，2024，6（2）：278-289.