国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 209793
当前下载量 275958

社会科学进展

Progress in Social Sciences

ISSN Print: 2664-6943
ISSN Online: 2664-6951
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

大学生心理健康普查不同施测方式的比较

Comparison of Different Methods of Mental Health Survey for College Students

社会科学进展 / 2021,3(6):606-616 / 2022-01-05 look470 look496
  • 作者: 张秋艳     
  • 单位:
    广州商学院,广州
    
  • 关键词: 心理普查;施测方式;大学生
  • Psychological census; Measurement method; College students
  • 摘要: 随着移动互联网技术的不断进步,心理普查施测方式越来越多样。本文通过实验法、文献法和焦点访谈法,对高校心理普查的施测方式进行比较。采用2×2 的实验设计,检验了不同施测端口(移动端、电脑端)、不同施测形式(集中、分散)对施测效果的影响;并通过访谈法和文献法进行更深入地分析。结果发现,(1)实验设计得到的数据显示不同施测方式的实施效果差异不显著;(2)访谈中发现学生从自身便利性考虑倾向于选择手机(微信)自主完成测试;(3)无论选择哪种施测方式,提高心理普查的施测效果,可以从明确施测的目的、提高测量工具的科学性、施测主试的专业性和受试的配合程度等方面入手。
  • With the continuous progress of mobile Internet technology, psychological census methods are more and more diverse. This paper compares the methods of psychological survey in colleges and universities by experimental method, document method and focus interview method. A 2×2 experimental design was used to test the effects of different test ports (mobile terminal, computer terminal) and different test forms (centralized and decentralized) on the test results. Interviews and literature were used to further investigate acne. The results showed that (1) the data obtained from the experimental design showed no significant difference in the implementation effect of different testing methods. (2) It was found in the interview that students tended to choose mobile phones to complete the test independently for their own convenience. (3) No matter which testing method was selected, the testing effect of psychological census was improved. We can make clear the purpose of measurement, improve the scientific of measurement tools, the professionalism of test subjects and the degree of cooperation of test subjects.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0305050
  • 引用: 张秋艳.大学生心理健康普查不同施测方式的比较[J].社会科学进展,2021,3(6):606-616.
已有账号
027-59302486