国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 165495
当前下载量 220754

社会科学进展

Progress in Social Sciences

ISSN Print: 2664-6943
ISSN Online: 2664-6951
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

对我国民事诉讼证明标准的一些反思

Some Reflections on the Standard of Proof in Civil Litigation in China

社会科学进展 / 2022,4(2):127-139 / 2022-03-30 look227 look241
  • 作者: 王慧      钟声扬     
  • 单位:
    上海政法学院,上海
  • 关键词: 民事诉讼证明标准;高度盖然性;排除合理怀疑;证明力;优势证据
  • Standard of proof in civil litigation; High degree of conclusiveness; Beyond a reasonable doubt; Relevance; Preponderance of evidence
  • 摘要: 我国民事诉讼证明标准存在着概念定义不明晰,适用混乱的问题。学界对证明标准的层次划分也一直存在争议,对特殊证明标准的适用范围以及是否应当明确界定民事诉讼与刑事诉讼的证明标准等一直是理论争议的焦点。对此,我们应当明确民事诉讼证明标准的最初目的,不可限于理论争议的泥沼之中而忘记任何一种制度设计都是要为实践服务的。证明过程是一个主观的抽象过程,证明标准不能脱离于此而追求绝对的真实。证明标准应当尽量符合一般人的认知水平和社会普遍的道德观念。
  • China’s civil litigation standard of proof suffers from unclear definition of the concept and confusion in its application. The issue of the hierarchy of proof standards has been controversial among academics, the scope of application of the special standard of proof has been the focus of theoretical controversy. Whether the standard of proof in civil litigation and criminal litigation should be clearly defined has also been the focus of theoretical controversy. In this regard, we should clarify the original purpose of the civil litigation standard of proof, not limited to theoretical disputes in the mire and forget that any kind of institutional design is to serve the practice. Proof process is a subjective abstract process, the standard of proof can not be separated from this and the pursuit of absolute truth. The standard of proof should be in line with the general level of cognition and the general moral concept of society as far as possible.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0402012
  • 引用: 王慧, 钟声扬.对我国民事诉讼证明标准的一些反思[J].社会科学进展,2022,4(2):127-139.
已有账号
027-59302486