国际中文开源期刊平台

客观预备合并之诉

Objective Preliminary Combination of Litigation

社会科学进展 / 2022,4(1)：53-65 / 2022-02-21 334 374

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 徐宇晨     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院，上海
  

• 关键词： 诉的合并；客观的预备的诉的合并；先位之诉；备位之诉
• Combination of ligation; Objective preliminary combination of ligation; Prior litigation; Subsequent litigation
• 摘要： 诉之合并制度我国学界略有涉及，但对其中的客观预备合并之诉研究不够深入，立法上也处于空白状态。客观预备诉之合并与诉讼请求合并不同。该制度有利于减轻当事人讼累、保障法秩序稳定等优势，我国立法应在参照大陆法系法治发达国家经验的基础上，结合本国国情和司法实践具体情况，逐步引入、认可该项制度。审理时法院须尊重原告处分权，按照主诉先备位诉后的顺序进行审理，不可同时审理两诉，二审根据当事人上诉的内容视情况分别处理。
• The combination of ligation is slightly discussed in China, but the research on the objective preliminary combination of litigation is not deep enough, and the legislation is also in a blank state. The objective preliminary combination of ligation is different from the combination of claims. It is conducive to reducing the litigation burden of the parties and ensuring the stability of the legal order. China’s legislation should gradually introduce and recognize this system on the basis of referring to the experience of developed countries with the rule of law in the civil law system, combined with China’s national conditions and the specific situation of judicial practice. During the trial, the court must respect the plaintiff’s right of disposition and try the case in the order of the main lawsuit first and the standby lawsuit later. Two lawsuits cannot be tried at the same time. The second instance shall be handled separately according to the contents of the parties’ appeal as the case may be.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0401005
• 引用： 徐宇晨．客观预备合并之诉［J］．社会科学进展，2022，4（1）：53-65．