国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 165465
当前下载量 220714

社会科学进展

Progress in Social Sciences

ISSN Print: 2664-6943
ISSN Online: 2664-6951
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

道德与法律:各领风采数百年——读《法律的道德性》有感

Morality and Law: Each Leading Style for Hundreds of Years —Reading “The morality of Law”

社会科学进展 / 2021,3(6):549-559 / 2021-12-28 look362 look278
  • 作者: 秦雯     
  • 单位:
    中国政法大学国际儒学院,海淀
  • 关键词: 道德性;法律性;富勒
  • Morality; Law; Lon L.Fuller
  • 摘要: 20 世纪在西方法学界有三场重要的学术论战,其中最负盛名的就是富勒与哈特关于法律与道德关系的论战。当道德与法律的关系变得纠缠不清的时候,究竟是法律还是道德是人们应当首先遵守的行为标准?这在西方是无可争议的事情。但在传统中国,道德似乎超越法律,成为调整社会生活的重要方式。事实上如果我们把富勒关于法律与道德的关系理解为“法律中的道德性”,那么在传统中国社会的情况则与之相反,其应该被称为“道德中的法律性”。本文的目的就是理清这种法律的道德性与道德的法律性之间的区别。
  • In the 20th century, there were three important academic debates in western legal circles, among which the most famous one was the debate between Fuller and Hart on the relationship between law and morality. When the relationship between morality and law becomes entangled, is it law or morality that is adjusting our society? It is beyond dispute in the west, but back to our traditional legal culture, seems there is also a kind of legal and moral entanglements, and the law and the law has certain difference, fuller know actually if we put the fuller about law and the moral understanding of the relationship as “the law of morality”, so in traditional Chinese society should be, by contrast, it should be called “the law of morality”. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the difference between the moral nature of law and the legal nature of morality.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0305044
  • 引用: 秦雯.道德与法律:各领风采数百年——读《法律的道德性》有感[J].社会科学进展,2021,3(6):549-559.
已有账号
027-59302486