International Open Access Journal Platform

民事诉讼中瑕疵证据的效力研究

Study on the Effect of Defective Evidence in Civil Procedure

Progress in Social Sciences / 2021,3(3): 233-241 / 2021-05-13 978 754

View Download PDF

• Authors: 梁      亮      陈泳全      夏帮震     
• Information:

  中南财经政法大学法律硕士教育中心，武汉

• Keywords: 瑕疵证据；非法证据；补强规则
• Defective evidence; Illegal evidence; Corroborative rules
• Abstract: 在民事诉讼中，对案件事实的判断主要基于证据链的完整度及真实性，因而证据的证明能力及证明力问题便是民事诉讼中的重头戏。瑕疵证据是指因取证手段、证据表现形式有缺陷而导致证明能力欠缺、证明力不足的证据。目前我国对瑕疵证据的规范并不完善，大多数理论研究也还局限于探讨其与非法证据的界限问题。本文便是在此背景下进行研究，明确瑕疵证据的基本概念，研究瑕疵证据与非法证据的异同，并提出完善建议。
• In civil litigation, the judgment of the facts of a case is mainly based on the completeness and authenticity of the evidence chain. Therefore, the issue of the ability and power of proof of evidence is the highlight of the civil litigation. Defective evidence refers to evidence that lacks the ability to prove and the power of proof due to defects in the means of obtaining evidence and the form of evidence. At present, my country's standard for flawed evidence is not perfect, and most theoretical research is also limited to discussing the boundary between it and illegal evidence. This article is to conduct research in this context, clarify the basic concepts of flawed evidence, study the similarities and differences between flawed evidence and illegal evidence, and put forward suggestions for improvement.
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0303015
• Cite: 梁亮，陈泳全，夏帮震．民事诉讼中瑕疵证据的效力研究［J］．社会科学进展，2021，3（3）：233-241．