国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 66229
当前下载量 69789

休闲运动与健康

Leisure Sports and Health

ISSN Print:2710-0154
ISSN Online:2710-0162
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

本体感觉精确性测量的系统性文献回顾与分析

Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of Proprioceptive Accuracy Measurement

休闲运动与健康 / 2024,4(2):11-16 / 2024-10-17 look20 look13
  • 作者: 朱平江     
  • 单位:
    湖北大学体育学院,武汉
  • 关键词: 运动控制;本体感觉;文献分析
  • Motor control; Proprioception; Literature analysis
  • 摘要: 本研究主要探讨了个体对自身体感信息的理解能力,即本体感觉精度。这些信息源自运动系统各部位的机械感受器及皮肤的触觉感受器,为评估感觉运动功能提供关键依据。然而,评估本体感觉精度的标准方法目前尚未被广泛接纳。本文是一项系统性研究,旨在识别并分类评估本体感觉精度各方面的不同方法。在国内外多个数据库中进行文献检索,包括万方、维普、百度学术、SCIE、PubMed、SPORTDiscus、ScienceDirect和SpringerLink等。结果显示,检索到1386篇科学论文,经过筛选后剔除了739篇,最终收录了647篇。涵盖了本体感觉的8个不同方面:关节位置感知、运动及运动范围感知、轨迹感知、速度感知、力量水平感知、肌肉紧张感知、重量感知以及物体大小感知。采用了三种心理物理学的方法:变量调节测量、恒定测量以及极限值测量。但不同任务对不同身体部位的结果并无关联,即本体感觉精度具有部位特异性和方法特异性,因此需要基于理论考虑和生态效度选择合适的测量方法。
  • This study primarily explores the individual’s understanding of self-body perception information, namely proprioceptive accuracy. This information originates from mechanoreceptors in various parts of the motor system and tactile receptors in the skin, providing critical evidence for assessing sensorimotor function. However, a standardized method for evaluating proprioceptive accuracy has not yet been widely accepted. This paper is a systematic study aimed at identifying and classifying different methods for assessing various aspects of proprioceptive accuracy. We conducted literature searches in multiple domestic and international databases, including Wan Fang, VIP, Baidu Scholar, SCIE, PubMed, SPORTD iscus, Science Direct, and SpringerLink. The results show that we retrieved 1,386 scientific papers, from which 739 were eliminated after screening, ultimately including 647. These cover eight different aspects of proprioception: joint position sense, movement and range of motion perception, trajectory perception, speed perception, force level perception, muscle tension perception, weight perception, and object size perception. These methods employed three psychophysical approaches: variable adjustment measurement, constant measurement, and threshold measurement. However, the results for different body parts were unrelated to different tasks, indicating that proprioceptive accuracy is site-specific and method-specific. Therefore, appropriate measurement methods need to be chosen based on theoretical considerations and ecological validity.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/lsh.0402003
  • 引用: 朱平江.本体感觉精确性测量的系统性文献回顾与分析[J].休闲运动与健康,2024,4(2):11-16.
已有账号
027-59302486