Cheerleading; Knowledge graph; General journal; CSSCI
摘要:
本文以 CNKI 数据为样本,运用科学知识图谱,揭示国内啦啦操研究领域普刊和 C 刊在研究选题、内容和方法上的异同,研究认为:C 刊选题更具前瞻性,体现在体系构建和同项群比较上;C 刊研究内容多交叉学科研究、相互渗透,多结合社会热点问题;C 刊在研究方法上更具独创性,多运用实验法、影像分析法、层次分析法及因子分析法等。通过两类文献比较分析,对我国啦啦操项目研究前沿及做好啦啦操高质量研究具有指导意义。
Taking CNKI data as a sample and using the atlas of scientific knowledge, this paper reveals the similarities and differences in research topics, contents and methods between general journals and C journals in the field of Cheerleading research in China. The research shows that the topic selection of C journal is more forward-looking, which is reflected in the construction of system and the comparison of the same event group; The research contents of journal C are interdisciplinary research and mutual penetration, combined with social hot issues; Journal C is more original in research methods, using experimental method, image analysis method, analytic hierarchy process and factor analysis method. Through the comparative analysis of the two kinds of literature, it has guiding significance for the research frontier of Cheerleading projects in China and the high-quality research of cheerleading.