Literature and data method and comparative research method were used to compare the physical education
and health curriculum standards in terms of goal setting, learning level division, content setting and evaluation. The
study found that the target difference between Chinese and US sports and health curriculum standards is not obvious,
All revolve around the students’ physical quality, Promote the all-round development of students; In the standard
division of high school physical education and health courses, China and the United States have different years of
study, The United States divides the learning level of students in the same grade greatly from China, The practice of
teaching students in the same grade according to their athletic ability, To a certain extent, China can learn from it; The
content and evaluation of sports courses are the disadvantage of our country, Sports course content did not keep pace
with The Times, There is also no outstanding regional characteristics; The operability of physical education learning
evaluation is not strong, Therefore, students have no sense of value for learning physical education. Revelation: China
should refine the physical education curriculum standards, including content standards and evaluation standards;
improve the operability of learning evaluation; conduct physical education teaching according to students’ physical
and mental development; and realize the possibility of formulating physical education curriculum standards with
regional characteristics