The evaluation of evidence plays a crucial role in the process of scientific evidence generation, exerting a significant impact on the utilization of scientific evidence within legal proceedings.The likelihood ratio quantifies the probability ratio between two competing claims, exhibiting characteristics of objectivity, transparency, and fault tolerance.Incorporating the application of likelihood ratio assessment in the evaluation of common material evidence, this study examines the scientific approach to evaluating evidence through likelihood ratio analysis from two perspectives.From the perspective of forensic identification, an evaluation method that excessively relies on the subjective judgment of the appraiser exacerbates uncertainty in both the appraisal process and its outcome, thereby perpetuating these uncertainties into the fact determination link. The evaluation of likelihood ratio can effectively enhance the objectivity and validity of scientific evidence, thereby providing a more scientifically rigorous approach for utilizing scientific evidence in fact determination. From the point of view of fact finding, The likelihood ratio evaluation method enables the quantification of evidence’s impact on the fact finder’s belief, reducing judges’ reliance on scientific evidence, enhancing the standardization and rationality of their fact finding process, and facilitating scientifically grounded factual determinations.