国际中文开源期刊平台

大数据侦查的司法逻辑补强与规制路径完善

Judicial Logic Reinforcement and Regulatory Path Complement of Big Data Criminal Investigation

刑事司法科学与治理 / 2023,4(1)：21-30 / 2023-06-16 315 310

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 王易     
• 单位：

  中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，武汉

• 关键词： 大数据侦查；侦查措施；司法逻辑；规制路径
• Big data criminal investigation; Investigation measures; Judicial logic; Regulation path
• 摘要： 大数据技术与刑事侦查的深度融合催生了大数据侦查，有力回应了犯罪新形势。但在实践中，大数据侦查存在行政逻辑、技术逻辑过剩，而司法逻辑不足的问题。从概念上看，大数据侦查将未罪纳入侦查对象的概念界定方式值得反思。大数据侦查的司法逻辑缺陷衍生出行为异化、冲击刑事诉讼体系等实践风险，需要在理论层面针对大数据侦查的行为性质、方法原理与价值旨归三方面内涵做出合乎司法逻辑的纠正与补强，形成约束性原则。在此基础上，将原则约束具体化为程序规制，从侦查措施维度、证据适用维度、辩护保障维度确定大数据侦查规制的完善路径。
• The deep integration of big data technology and criminal investigation has led to big data investigation, which has effectively responded to the new situation of crime. But in practice, big data investigation is excessive in administrative logic and technical logic, but short in judicial logic. At the same time, the research of big data investigation is mostly limited to the investigation stage, but fails to explore the impact of big data application on criminal justice from the perspective of criminal litigation. Starting from the concept of big data investigation, this paper questioned the way to include “future crime” in the objects of big data investigation. Then it summarizes three theoretical defects and practical risks in the judicial field of big data investigation, and makes up for the lack of judicial logic. On this basis, this paper proposes the improvement path of big data investigation regulation from the dimensions of investigation measures, evidence application and defense guarantee, aiming to curb the judicial risk of big data criminal investigation.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0401004
• 引用： 王易．大数据侦查的司法逻辑补强与规制路径完善［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2023，4（1）：21-30．