The conditions for artificial intelligence as an independent legal personality are not mature. Artificial intelligence in the process of intervening in judicial adjudication, due to the technical limitations of the system itself and its operating logic, the artificial intelligence system should be positioned as an auxiliary tool for human adjudication, the subject of trial responsibility can only be humans, and the designer and operator of artificial intelligence bear responsibility lack of certain theoretical support, the real adjudicator of the case is the judge, and the judge should bear the corresponding trial responsibility when meeting the constituent elements.