国际中文开源期刊平台

小吃类地理标志集体商标 “劈叉性维权”问题研究 ——以“潼关肉夹馍”维权案件为例

A Study on the “Discriminatory Rights” of Collective Trademarks for Snack Food Geographical Indications —Take the Case of the “Tongguan rougamo” Rights Defense Case as an Example

法学进展 / 2024,6(4)：357-367 / 2024-09-04 149 137

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 李和佳     
• 单位：

  国家检察官学院，北京

• 关键词： 潼关肉夹馍；地理标志集体商标；维权不当
• Tongguan rougamo; Collective trademark of geographical indications; Improperly upheld rights
• 摘要： 新时代乡村振兴战略实施背景下，地理标志的保护也愈发为人重视，而鉴于其特殊属性，权利人维权领域被极大压缩。以“潼关肉夹馍”协会不正当维权一案为例，地方小吃作为地理标志具有区域性公共权利，故而被认定为维权不当无可非议。然于权利人却无救济途径，有苦难言。追根究底，“潼关肉夹馍”们注册地理标志集体商标商标合理性存疑，商标类型选择多样，但是专有权保护却并非殊途同归，故而在如今劈叉式维权背景下，商标申请类别的改变或能为“潼关肉夹馍”们扩展维权途径。
• Under the background of the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy in the new era, the protection of geographical indications has become increasingly important. In view of its special attributes, the field of the rights holder’s rights protection has been greatly compressed. Taking the case of the improper rights protection of the “Tongguan rougamo” association as an example, local snacks as geographical indications have regional public rights, so it is justifiable to be recognized as improper rights protection. However, there is no remedy for the rights holder, and there is suffering. To get to the bottom of it, the rationality of the registration of collective trademarks of geographical indications of “Tongguan rougamo” is questionable, and there are various types of trademarks, but the exclusive right protection is not the same. Therefore, in the context of the current split rights protection, the change of trademark application categories may be able to expand the rights protection channels of “Tongguan rougamo”.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0604029
• 引用： 李和佳．小吃类地理标志集体商标“劈叉性维权”问题研究——以“潼关肉夹馍”维权案件为例［J］．法学进展，2024，6（4）：357-367.