国际中文开源期刊平台

民事诉讼中当事人陈述制度的比较研究

A Comparative Study on the System of Party Representation in Civil Proceedings

法学进展 / 2024,6(2)：125-134 / 2024-05-22 61 64

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 郑仙丹     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院，上海

• 关键词： 当事人陈述制度；民事诉讼；比较研究一、引言
• Party statement system; Civil litigation; Comparative study
• 摘要： 我国《民事诉讼法》中对于民事证据的调查等事项都做出了明确的规定，但是对于当事人陈述制度的规定却并不是很完善。当事人陈述制度是民事诉讼中的一种证据来源形式，在民事诉讼中具有重要地位，但现实中，当事人陈述制度作为重要证据来源却并未发挥其有效价值及作用。本文为解答现实问题，探究在民事诉讼中当事人陈述制度的起源与演变，横向比较英美法系与大陆法系的当事人陈述制度，学习古今中外优秀的当事人陈述制度的经验及理论，分析当前我国民诉法及司法解释中当事人诉讼制度的不足与空白，并提出完善我国当前民事诉讼当事人陈述制度的相关建议，为现实困境提供一些在司法实践层面的参照与帮助。
• China’s Civil Procedure Law has made clear provisions on theinvestigation of civil evidence, but the provisions on the party statement systemare not very perfect. The party statement system is a kind of evidence sourceform in civil litigation, which has an important position in civil litigation, butin reality, the party statement system as an important evidence source has notplayed its effective value and role. In order to answer practical problems, explorethe origin and evolution of the party statement system in civil proceedings,make a horizontal comparison between the party statement system of Anglo American law system and civil law system, learn the experience and theoryof the outstanding party statement system of ancient and modern China andabroad, and analyze the deficiencies and blanks of the party litigation system inthe current Chinese national procedure law and judicial interpretation. And putforward the relevant suggestions to improve the current civil litigant statementsystem in our country, to provide some reference and help in judicial practicefor the practical dilemma.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0602011
• 引用： 郑仙丹．民事诉讼中当事人陈述制度的比较研究［J］．法学进展，2024，6（2）：125-134.