国际中文开源期刊平台

诉讼时效抗辩的法官释明权研究

Study of the Judge’s Right to Explain the Statute of Limitations Defense

法学进展 / 2023,5(3)：125-137 / 2023-07-05 228 194

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 何旭     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院，上海

• 关键词： 诉讼时效；抗辩权；法官释明权
• Statute of limitations; Defenses; Right to judge’s explanation
• 摘要： 我国现行立法对于诉讼中法官能够进行诉讼时效抗辩释明的问题基本持否定态度，但是却并未有准确的立法规定，导致司法裁判实务形成混乱局面。诉讼时效抗辩涉及到实体法与程序法两个层面的问题，明确事实抗辩与权利抗辩，将诉讼时效抗辩进行性质定位，对于诉讼时效抗辩，明确当事人在诉讼中提出有关抗辩之构成要件事实的情况下进行消极释明的法律依据，增强法官释明能力，是我国协同主义下发展背景发挥法官释明权制度的重要形式。只有具有了具有逻辑性的理论和完备的立法依据，才能够保障法官正确行使有关诉讼时效抗辩的释明，实现实体正义价值与程序正义价值的平衡。
• China’s current legislation for the judge in litigation to be able tocarry out the issue of the statute of limitations defenses explained basicallynegative attitude, but there is no precise legislative provisions, resulting in theformation of confusion in judicial practice. The statute of limitations defenseinvolves two levels of substantive law and procedural law, clear factual defenseand right defense, the nature of the statute of limitations defense, for the statuteof limitations defense, clarify the legal basis for negative interpretation of theparties in the case of the facts relating to the constitutive elements of the defense,to enhance the ability of judges to explain, is an important development of thebackground of the development of China’s synergism to play an important rolein the system of judges to explain the right. The form of the interpretation Onlywith a logical theory and complete legislative basis, can the judge guarantee thecorrect exercise of the interpretation of the defense of the statute of limitationsand achieve a balance between the value of substantive justice and the value ofprocedural justice.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0503011
• 引用： 何旭．诉讼时效抗辩的法官释明权研究［J］．法学进展，2023，5（3）：125-137．