After several twists and turns, throwing objects from high above was
finally classified as a crime under the section of the crime of disturbing public
order. As a new crime, high altitude parabolic sin unavoidably exist for section
brief explanation is not clear, and so misleading, even so it is necessary, the
subjective important document and objective important document content,
reveals that, the processing may face problems in the process of high altitude
parabolic crime, which provide reliable reference for the judicial practice. This
paper holds that the subjective element of throwing objects from high altitude
is intentional, while the objective element needs to analyze the concepts of
“high altitude”, “throwing” and “objects”, so as to give reasonable answers to the
questions. In addition, it is also worth discussing whether the establishment
of the crime of throwing objects from above will lead to the confusion of civil
punishment, the abuse of punishment or the insignificance of the crime because
it is difficult to determine the responsible person. However, only theoretical
research is obviously not enough, and it needs the experience of judicial practice
to prove it. In the future, the content of the crime of throwing objects from high
altitude needs more explanation and guidance. The case should be enriched and
the criminal law circle should give a proper and reasonable answer.