International Open Access Journal Platform

刑法解释论视角下的高空抛物问题

The Problem of Throwing Objects off High Building from the Perspective of Criminal law Interpretation

Advance in Law / 2022,4(4): 163-173 / 2022-11-15 407 438

View Download PDF

• Authors: 唐佳辉     
• Information:

  上海政法学院，上海

• Keywords: 刑法解释；高空抛物；主观要件；客观要件；刑罚滥用；罪名虚设
• Explanation; High altitude parabolic; Subjective requirement; Objective requirement; The penalty abuse; Setting up meaningless charges
• Abstract: 高空抛物入刑几经波折，最终被归为扰乱公共秩序罪这一节下的一个罪名。作为新罪，高空抛物罪难免存在为求条文言简意赅而解释不清，甚至因此使人产生误解的情况，因此有必要详解其主观要件、客观要件内容，揭示认定、处理高空抛物犯罪过程中可能面临的问题，从而为司法实践提供可靠的参考。本文认为，高空抛物的主观要件为故意，而客观要件则需分析“高空”“抛掷”“物品”等概念含义，对存疑之处做出合理解答。此外，高空抛物罪的设立是否会导致民刑混淆，刑罚滥用或者因为难以确定责任人而使之形同虚设的问题也值得探讨，但仅有理论研究明显不够，还需司法实践的经验予以佐证。未来，高空抛物罪的内容还需更多解释和指导案例使之得以充实，有待刑法界给出恰当合理的答案。
• After several twists and turns, throwing objects from high above was finally classified as a crime under the section of the crime of disturbing public order. As a new crime, high altitude parabolic sin unavoidably exist for section brief explanation is not clear, and so misleading, even so it is necessary, the subjective important document and objective important document content, reveals that, the processing may face problems in the process of high altitude parabolic crime, which provide reliable reference for the judicial practice. This paper holds that the subjective element of throwing objects from high altitude is intentional, while the objective element needs to analyze the concepts of “high altitude”, “throwing” and “objects”, so as to give reasonable answers to the questions. In addition, it is also worth discussing whether the establishment of the crime of throwing objects from above will lead to the confusion of civil punishment, the abuse of punishment or the insignificance of the crime because it is difficult to determine the responsible person. However, only theoretical research is obviously not enough, and it needs the experience of judicial practice to prove it. In the future, the content of the crime of throwing objects from high altitude needs more explanation and guidance. The case should be enriched and the criminal law circle should give a proper and reasonable answer.
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0404016
• Cite: 唐佳辉．刑法解释论视角下的高空抛物问题［J］．法学进展，2022，4（4）：163-173．